Thursday, June 5, 2008

How the media would cover the decline in American casualties if they didn't hate America

Bull O'Really? (caution: bad word alert) and others are in a dither at the MSM coverage of the fact that the number of American lives lost in Iraq last month was at its lowest level since the war began. But it's not like it wasn't covered. It just wasn't fair and balanced, like it should have been, thusly:

AMERICAN LIBERATED BAGHDAD -- Americans suffered their fewest casualities since the liberation of Iraq from the tyranical rule of Saddam Hussein who was 100 percent exactly like Hitler and gassed his own people before the far-sighted George W. Bush launched his noble but fully justified and will be vidicated by history heroic mission to create a stable, democratic government in the Middle East that will be a model to other nations in the area to follow suit.
This statistic shows that the surge, which was the brainchild of the man soon to be the next president of the United States John McCain who has the experience and the intelligence to lead America unlike some elitist Harvard-educated guy whose bigoted pastor hates America for a living, is working and proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that we are winning against the Islamo-fascists and should continue our mission, which should in no way be confused with nation-building which is something only Democrats would do.

No comments:

Post a Comment